Summaries | NCRVE Home |
Site Search |
Product Search
Tech Prep Implementation in the United States:
Promising Trends and Lingering Challenges (MDS-714)
D. Bragg, J. Layton, F. Hammons
The Carl D. Perkins Applied Technology and Vocational Education Act of
1990, commonly known as Perkins II, included Tech Prep within the
special projects section (Title IIIE). Federal funds were appropriated
for this initiative beginning in July of 1991. Since that time, each
of the fifty states and the District of Columbia has been involved in
Tech Prep education activities; all have contributed to the research
findings reported in this document. In the summer of 1993, a
questionnaire was mailed to 473 of the identified 855 local Tech Prep
coordinators in the United States with 84% of those asked to
participate returning a completed questionnaire. The research focused
on these five research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of
local Tech Prep consortia and their coordinators? (2) What are the
goals, elements, and outcomes of local Tech Prep initiatives? (3) At
what stage of implementation are local Tech Prep initiatives and
selected Tech Prep components operating within those initiatives? (4)
What barriers are perceived to impact local Tech Prep implementation?
and (5) What do local coordinators perceive to be needed changes in
state and federal policy?
Promising Trends and Lingering Challenges
Findings obtained for the five research questions were helpful in
capturing a comprehensive description of how local Tech Prep
implementation has proceeded in the United States through the first
two years of federal support. Among this wealth of information, the
survey responses revealed the following promising trends:
- As many as 50% of the nation's high schools are identified by
respondents as participants in Tech Prep implementation in a local
consortium, indicating dramatic growth in Tech Prep activity at the
secondary education level from 1991 (pre-Perkins II) to 1993
(post-Perkins II).
- Although it is nearly impossible to identify any organizational
configuration of a local Tech Prep consortium as typical, these
findings indicate that on average the majority of local consortia
consist of twelve high schools, two postsecondary schools, and ten
private-sector business and industry firms. The organizational
structure of the consortium, including secondary schools,
postsecondary schools, business and industry, and sometimes other
organizations, may enhance Tech Prep implementation efforts.
- Coordinator ratings of student outcomes showed a high level of
consensus. Fifteen of the seventeen student outcomes were given a
"high" or "very high" mean rating. These fifteen highly rated outcomes
presented a broad array of expectations for Tech Prep participants and
graduates, incorporating the areas of academic skill attainment,
employability skill attainment, and matriculation from high school to
college.
- Several stakeholder groups showed a high level of support for Tech
Prep. The level of support for seven different groups was rated, on
average, to be "good" to "excellent." These groups were state agency
personnel, vocational faculty, local two-year postsecondary
administrators, business/industry representatives, local secondary
administrators, students, and secondary school board members. Only one
group was given an average rating of "fair." This group was four-year
college/university personnel.
- Professional development of secondary and postsecondary personnel
has been carried out by nearly all local consortia. Nearly 90%
reported joint inservice training for teachers from an entire
consortium to be a formally stated focus on their Tech Prep
initiative. Professional development of secondary personnel regarding
Tech Prep was more prevalent than of postsecondary personnel.
Although, on average, one-half of vocational faculty, counselors, and
administrators at both levels were reported to have participated in
Tech Prep inservice in local consortia.
The data from this research also revealed the following lingering
challenges:
- Most of the Tech Prep coordinators worked on Tech Prep part-time or
as part of their regular job. Other resource constraints were evident
in the findings, including the widespread perception of a lack of
joint planning time and a lack of staff, time, and money as barriers
to local implementation.
- The Tech Prep initiative has broad and conflicting goals and, as
such, Tech Prep access may not be available to all students, even
though equal access for all students was reported as a priority for
most consortia. The findings show the vast majority of local consortia
directing curriculum goals to serve the middle two quartiles of
students in academic ability, bringing into question the role Tech
Prep can and should play in educational restructuring endeavors.
- Little postsecondary curriculum reform and development for Tech Prep
was reported except for formal articulation of vocational and academic
courses. Over one-half of the respondents also reported implementing
occupational/career clusters at the secondary and postsecondary
levels. In addition, the findings associated with curriculum reform
show that at the secondary or postsecondary levels few local consortia
were engaged in what might be considered more advanced and complex
curriculum reform such as providing advanced-skills courses, career
academies, or interdisciplinary courses.
- School-to-work components such as work-based learning and
apprenticeship have not been widely implemented. However, work-based
learning was identified as a formally stated focus of two-thirds of
the local consortia participating in the study and the level of
implementation of work-based learning was perceived to be higher for
consortia funded in 1991 than in 1992.
- The most serious barriers to the implementation of Tech Prep are
deeply rooted and have not been surmounted. The obstacles of not
enough time designated for joint planning by vocational and academic
or secondary and postsecondary faculty; the failure of four-year
colleges and universities to award college credit for applied academic
or other Tech Prep courses; a lack of general awareness about Tech
Prep; and the lack of staff, time, and money were perceived by
respondents as having the most impact on their activities, and their
impact has remained serious with the passage of time.
Recommendations
The data collected and analyzed from this national study of local Tech
Prep implementation support the following recommendations:
- Due to the growing involvement in Tech Prep activities across the
nation and the reality that change within public schools requires
time, funding for the Tech Prep initiative should be continued at the
federal level and expanded to include local and state funds. Financial
support must be continued to bolster the existing efforts to induce
systemic change within the nation's public school and two-year college
system.
- The scope and focus for students involved with Tech Prep should be
expanded beyond the 2+2 concept to include the participation of change
agents at other educational levels, especially elementary and middle
schools, and colleges and universities.
- With global economic competition a reality and with the development
of human resources recognized as a key factor in the economic
development of the nation, Tech Prep should be promoted and marketed
on a national level as a viable avenue for U.S. citizens to attain
lifelong learning and global workforce skills; the need for marketing
of Tech Prep concepts is also critical at the local and state levels
where workforce development and economic needs are most acute.
- Accountability, high standards, and evaluation of Tech Prep programs
are all imperative to ensure that the goals of this federally
supported initiative are being met. This research has revealed that
only a small percentage of Tech Prep consortia are actively addressing
the issues of evaluation and accountability. Therefore, the funding
agencies for Tech Prep should develop viable on-site accountability
and evaluation mechanisms that can ensure that high standards and
expectations are being identified and met.
- The nation's public schools are caught in a quagmire of different
national reform initiatives such as Goals 2000, School-to-Work
Opportunities (STWO), and Tech Prep, with many more reform initiatives
dictated to public schools at the local and state level. This
uncoordinated educational reform effort creates confusion and
fragmentation of activities within schools as evidenced by the "fad"
perception that many of these efforts hold among teachers, parents,
and school administrators. A concerted effort at all administrative
levels is needed to link reform initiatives together that can build on
existing efforts, improve upon the reform processes, and move forward
with school reform initiatives.
- The barriers to implementation of Tech Prep should receive special
notice. Research should be developed to search for and discover why
barriers exist in various educational environments, especially among
teachers and educational institutions, which are perceived to be the
"great equalizer and designed to empower our nation's people" and not
the contrary as this research indicates.
In conclusion, with local consortia having made commitments to the
Tech Prep concept, promising trends are emerging with evidence of
enthusiasm reported among educators, parents, students, and employers.
These groups appear to be utilizing the Tech Prep concept to improve
existing educational systems, expanding students' opportunities to be
productive in the workplace and successful in life's pursuits. A
continuing challenge for our nation is to support the many local Tech
Prep consortia that show commitment to Tech Prep in ways that can
ensure reform will be significant and lasting.
Summaries | NCRVE Home |
Site Search |
Product Search