NCRVE Home | Site Search | Product Search

<< >> Title Contents

DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS


NCRVE's development activities bring NCRVE's work closer to points of practice. Working face-to-face with practitioners, we facilitate change, learn about the requirements for change, and then spread the word to other sites in the next stage of readiness. As equal partners, NCRVE researchers and practitioners jointly determine the design and together engineer, implement, and document innovative activities. Development activities provide us with the in-depth information the field demands for both implementation and the design of policy that best enables change.

Our development sites and their work will provide answers to the "what is it," "how to do it" questions, formative data, and a process for identifying additional issues and questions for further study. With this information we can create and provide richly informed descriptions, evaluations, and strategies. Ultimately, development activities will create success stories, will establish exemplars of policy translation, and will develop a cadre of leading practitioners.

A particular focus of the development work is to provide NCRVE with opportunities to test, refine, clarify, and more deeply understand the reform principles and ideas advocated and mandated in the 1990 Perkins Act and the 1994 School-to-Work Opportunities Act. The central points are (1) integration of vocational and academic curriculum, (2) combination of work-based with school-based learning, and (3) creation of links between secondary and postsecondary education.

We have established the following benchmarks to assess our success in meeting this purpose. Through development activities we will

To this end, researchers and practitioners play a variety of roles in the development of self-sustaining sites and the simultaneous study of reform. For researchers this includes coaching, mentoring, planning, training, evaluating, and developing local infrastructure. For practitioners, in addition to actual innovation, the list includes defining questions and design, and documenting change through data collection or journal writing. Equally important to development is an iterative process, cycling repeatedly between design, implementation, testing the design efficacy, and then redesigning once again.

Four different types of development activities are funded:

  1. Initiatives to form more intensive long-lasting relationships by creating networks that will unite schools, colleges, and NCRVE as we all work toward implementing key ideas articulated in the Perkins and School-to-Work Acts.

  2. Activities which add a development component to NCRVE research projects.

  3. Projects that improve NCRVE's capacity to respond to requests from the field for assistance in implementing the Perkins and School-to-Work Opportunities Acts.

  4. Activities to collaborate with other organizations such as the Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE) and state departments of education to discover answers to pressing questions from the field.

Area II:
Institutions, "Systems," Governance, and Policy

Project DII.1
New Designs for Two-Year Institutions of Higher Education

Project Directors: George H. Copa and William Ammentorp, University of Minnesota (Year 3 of 3)
Keywords:
community colleges; model development: community college design; educational planning; professional development; partnerships; futures; exemplary programs; technical assistance: curriculum/program improvement
The purpose of this project is to continue the research, development, dissemination, training, and implementation of new designs for the two-year institution of higher education developed over the past two years. This project will help ensure that New Designs and other related NCRVE efforts continue to expand their impact on systemic postsecondary educational reform across the United States. The project will be particularly effective in presenting a future vision for the leadership and direction of postsecondary education, including vocational technical education.

1997 activities are focused on bringing the project to culmination, integrating the project with other NCRVE initiatives, and providing continuity in service to the field after 1997. The major project efforts during 1997 will include the following activities:

  1. Publishing an executive summary of New Designs concepts in paper and electronic format.

  2. Developing a description of benchmark practices. Written case studies and, where feasible and appropriate, short videotapes of reasonable quality will be used as the medium for the descriptions.

  3. Disseminating new designs for the two-year institution through conferences, meetings, and workshops held by other groups and agencies.

  4. Providing direct technical assistance to institutions wishing to implement new designs for the two-year institution.

  5. Holding an institute for postsecondary institutions interested in in-depth exploration and implementation of New Designs concepts and specifications.

  6. Forming partnerships with other individuals, organizations, and agencies who have expertise related to improving and expanding on the design process and implementation of New Designs to ensure continuation of technical assistance to the field.

  7. Preparing a manuscript for a book which will describe the New Designs concepts and the benchmark case studies.

  8. Assisting in developing a vision for vocational education, and education more generally, in the two-year institutions of higher education, through collaboration with Project RII.5.

Project DII.3
Urban Schools Network Development Project

Project Director:
Erika Nielsen Andrew, University of California at Berkeley (Year 5 of 5)
Keywords:
network development; curriculum integration; school to work; Tech Prep; echnical assistance: curriculum/program improvement; urban schools; educational reform
The purpose of this project is to assist the Urban Schools Network teams engaged in the implementation of school-to-career programs. To this end, the relationship between the teams and NCRVE is guided by the Agreement for Program Improvement, a document built around the three core integrations: (1) vocational and academic education, (2) school-based and work-based activities, and (3) secondary and postsecondary institutions.

In the final year of the grant, we will work to ensure team longevity and institutionalization. To do so, we will involve significantly more educators within the networking schools, districts, and states, and we will develop further collaboration with other organizations sharing a similar purpose.

In the analysis of our efforts to date, two primary issues have surfaced leading to our current systemic focus:

  1. Full-School Redesign. The ideas embodied in Tech Prep, integration, and school-to-work call for nothing less than full school redesign. In addition to understanding new ways of thinking about education, these reforms require practitioners to reconsider ways of working together both as colleagues and with the community at large.

    Our response is to work more intensely in the sites. We propose three ways of doing this: (1) we will encourage teams to expand their efforts to a schoolwide focus, (2) we will help to develop the school-districtwide infrastructure necessary to support the school teams, and (3) we will supply more technical assistance through fellows and field consultants. Taken together, we will improve our efforts to work more broadly and deeply with sites.

  2. Comprehensive Evaluation. The use of data collection and evaluation serves both a summative purpose as well as serving as an important tool for both problem solving and advancing school change. We will teach teams about data collection and school improvement methods.

    In order to continue to meet schools' needs and inform policy, NCRVE will document their progress carefully, feeding back into the network and policy circles stories of institutional progress. Our careful documentation will also be helpful to school as a marketing tool to demonstrate what works.
Given the above, we are planning to engage the Network in the following:

Project DII.5
Field Consultants

Project Director:
David Stern, University of California at Berkeley (Year 1 of 1)
Keywords:
educational reform; curriculum integration partnership; technical assistance: curriculum/program improvement; echnical assistance: partnerships; technical assistance: school to work issues
The primary activity of NCRVE's field consultants is to support the work of the Urban Schools Network (Project DII.3). In addition, field consultants will provide technical assistance to other high schools and school districts working on school-to-career issues. One planned activity is assisting schools that are attempting to become members of the Hewlett/Annenberg-sponsored Bay Area School Reform Collaborative (BASRC). Assistance will take place in areas such as creating systems to support schoolwide change (e.g., policy issues, team building, strategic planning); building and sustaining partnerships with business, the community, and postsecondary institutions; and developing integrated curriculum that serves to increase academic achievement for all students.

Field Initiated Activities

Project Director:

David Stern, University of California at Berkeley (Year 1 of 1)

Keywords:

entrepreneurship education; school-based enterprise; curriculum integration
In 1996, an allocation was set aside to support activities that were initiated by requests from the field, either by practitioners or policymakers. Most of the 1996 allocation was spent on the conference School-to-Work: Preparing Students for College and Careers held at the State University of New York, Purchase Campus; and on the School-Based Enterprise (SBE) Technical Assistance Project with the Oakland (CA) Unified School District. In 1997, an allocation will be set aside to continue work on the SBE project, and like activities.

In 1997, the Oakland SBE project will continue to provide ongoing guidance to teachers and administrators developing enterprise initiatives in career academies. This is an innovative effort to develop SBEs that support an integrated vocational-academic curriculum. The Oakland initiative has entered its second year of operations, expanding to six career academies. After NCRVE's summer teacher training workshop, teachers requested follow-up assistance in several areas (e.g., identifying ways enterprise development can enhance core curricular objectives). In addition to conducting individual site visits, NCRVE will hold several workshops to reflect on progress made during the fall, to facilitate discussion and information sharing among teachers, and to provide follow up training on entrepreneurship curriculum. As with all field initiated activities, this effort will conclude with a written report.


<< >> Title Contents
NCRVE Home | Site Search | Product Search