References

American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Memphis, TN: Author. Available: http://www.richland.cc.il.us/imacc/standards/ [May 28, 1999].

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education[Online]. Available: http://act.psy.cmu.edu/personal/ja/misapplied.html [May 28, 1999].

Bailey, T. R. (1997). Integrating academic and industry skill standards(MDS-1001). Berkeley: National Center for Research in Vocational Education, University of California, Berkeley.

Bailey, T. R., & Merritt, D. (1997, October 29). School-to-work for the college bound. Education Week, pp. 32, 37.

Barton, P. E. (1997). Toward inequality: Disturbing trends in higher education. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bracey, G. W. (1997). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the United States. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Business Coalition for Education Reform. (1998). The formula for success: A business leader's guide to supporting math and science achievement.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Buxton, L. (1991). Math panic. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

California Academic Standards Commission. (1997). Mathematics standards. Sacramento: State Board of Education. Available: http://www.ca.gov/goldstandards/Drafts/Math/Math.html [May 28, 1999].
(Apparently no longer available, but this link is: http://www.cde.ca.gov/challenge/standards/MathHTML/mathfront.html)

Carnevale, A. P. (1998). Education and training for America's future. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Carnevale, A. P., & Rose, S. J. (1998). Education for what? The new office economy. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Cheney, L. (1997, August 11). Creative math or just "fuzzy math"? Once again basic skills fall prey to a fad. The New York Times, p. A13.

Cockroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. (1990). America's choice: High skills or low wages! Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.

Denning, P. J. (1997). Quantitative practices. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America(pp. 106-117). New York: The College Board.

Devlin, K. (1994). Mathematics: The science of patterns. New York: Scientific American Library.

Forman, S. L., & Steen, L. A. (1995). Mathematics for work and life. In I. Carl (Ed.), Seventy-five years of progress: Prospects for school mathematics(pp. 219-241). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Forman, S. L., & Steen, L. A. (1998). Beyond eighth grade: Report of a workshop on mathematical and occupational skill standards. Unpublished paper. Berkeley: National Center for Research in Vocational Education, University of California, Berkeley.

Forman, S. L., & Steen, L. A. (in press). Making authentic mathematics work for all students. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Hoachlander, E. G. (1997). Organizing mathematics education around work. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America(pp. 122-136). New York: The College Board.

Howe, R. (1998, March). Mathematics as externality: Implications for education. Mathematics Education Dialogues, pp. 8, 10-11. (Available from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.)

Information Technology Association of America. (1997). Help wanted: The IT workforce gap at the dawn of the new century. Arlington, VA: Author.

Judy, R. W., & D'Amico, C. (1997). Workforce 2020: Work and workers in the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.

Kilpatrick, J. (1997). Confronting reform. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 955-962.

Loftsgaarden, D. O., Rung, D. C., & Watkins, A. E. (1997). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States: Fall 1995 CBMS survey. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1995). Mathematical preparation of the technical work force. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Moore, E. H. (1903). On the foundations of mathematics. Science, 217, 401-416.

Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: Free Press.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1997a). The mathematics report card. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

NAEP. (1997b). NAEP 1996 trends in academic progress: Report in brief.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

National Association of Manufacturers. (1997). The skilled workforce shortage[Online]. Available: http://www.nam.org/Workforce/survey.html [May 28, 1999].

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1996). Vocational education in the United States: The early 1990s. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

NCES. (1998). Pursuing excellence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/timss/twelfth/ [May 28, 1999].

National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/ [May 28, 1999].

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Available: http://www.enc.org/reform/journals/enc2280/280dtoc1.htm [May 28, 1999].

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1998). High school mathematics at work. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Skill Standards Board. (1998). Occupational skill standards projects[Online]. Available: http://www.nssb.org/ [May 28, 1999].

Odom, W. E. (1998). Report of the senior assessment panel of the international assessment of the U.S. mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf9895/start.htm [May 28, 1999].

Packer, A. (1997). Mathematical competencies that employers expect. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America(pp. 137-154). New York: The College Board.

Raimi, R. A., & Braden, L. S. (1998). State mathematics standards. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Available: http://www.edexcellence.net/standards/math.html [May 28, 1999].

Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: Citizen's guide. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

Riley, R. W. (1998a, February 24). Press briefing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Riley, R. W. (1998b). The state of mathematics education: Building a strong foundation for the 21st century. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 45, 487-490. Available: http://www.ams.org/notices/199804/riley.pdf [May 28, 1999].

Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Summary available: http://www.stolaf.edu/other/extend/Resources/scans.html [May 28, 1999].

Shulman, L. F. (1997). Professing the liberal arts. In R. Orrill (Ed.), Re-imagining liberal learning in America(pp. 151-173). New York: The College Board.

Steen. L. A. (1988, April 29). The science of patterns. Science, 240, 611-616.

Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America. New York: The College Board.

Thurston, W. P. (1990). Mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 37, 844-850.

Tucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (1998). Standards for our schools: How to set them, measure them, and reach them. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wu, H. (1997). The mathematics education reform: Why you should be concerned and what you can do. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 946-954.