There appeared to be an empirical relationship as well as a logical one between the types of experience most frequently considered helpful to respondents and the developmental aspects of the experience that made them helpful. Empirically, the crosstabulation shown in Table 11 revealed that the five most frequently named types of experience tended to be most highly related to the seven most frequently named developmental aspects. The associations were also logical because they seemed to reflect what one might reasonably expect. For example:
| Developmental Aspect | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Item No. | Item No. | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | Total |
| Experience | Inter | Risk | New | Ove | Barr | Oth | Neg | Plan | Asmt | Lear | App | Con | Pos | Neg | Free | Cult | Oth | No Rel | ||
|
8
|
Across
educ. inst./org.
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
|
9
|
Across
educ. functions
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
13
|
| 10
|
Work
in business/industry
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
24
|
| 11
|
Work
in government
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
| 12
|
Other
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
| 13
|
Change
in context
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
| 14
|
New/increased
respons.
|
2
|
2
|
14
|
2
|
4
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
9
|
8
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
59
|
| 15
|
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| 16
|
Internship
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
| 17
|
Spec.
asgmnt: start-up
|
6
|
8
|
17
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
3
|
9
|
3
|
11
|
11
|
8
|
3
|
0
|
8
|
5
|
1
|
0
|
98
|
| 18
|
Spec.
asgmnt: fix-its
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
17
|
| 19
|
Spec.
asgmnt: other
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
25
|
| 20
|
Teaching/counseling
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
| 21
|
Personnel:
hiring
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
| 22
|
Personnel:
conflict/firing
|
0
|
7
|
8
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
6
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
8
|
5
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
61
|
| 23
|
Personnel:
developing
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
| 24
|
Work
on teams/committees
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
26
|
| 25
|
Mentors/couns./advocate | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| 26 | Work
with supervisor
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
41
|
| 27
|
Other
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
21
|
| 28
|
Prof.
association/union
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
| 29
|
Formal
training
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
27
|
| 30
|
Simulation/case
study
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| 31
|
Shadow/observation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
| 32
|
Networking
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| 33
|
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| 34
|
Community
service
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
| 35
|
Other
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
| Total
|
24
|
30
|
88
|
17
|
27
|
0
|
22
|
32
|
25
|
82
|
69
|
39
|
34
|
14
|
23
|
19
|
4
|
2
|
551
| |