NCRVE Home | Site Search | Product Search

<< >> Title Contents NCRVE Home

OVERVIEW

A Frame of Reference

This document draws from and builds upon the rich heritage of professional development, but more specifically on recent conceptions of professional development in an era of educational reform. Professional development (sometimes termed personnel development, staff development, and inservice education) has traditionally been the responsibility of colleges and universities. These institutions have tended to focus a great deal on preservice teacher education as well as teacher inservice education. However, numerous changes in the ways public schools operate as well as what is taught and how it is taught have had a profound effect on educators and the ways they develop on the job (Little, 1993). For example, the implementation of Tech Prep, vocational and academic education integration, school-to-work transition, and other large scale educational reforms have shown that teachers must be prepared to work at diverse tasks, including functioning as members of interdisciplinary and school/community/workplace teams and engaging in collaborative curriculum development and teaching (Finch, Schmidt, & Faulkner, 1992; Hartley, Mantle-Bromley, & Cobb, 1996). Organizational reform such as school-based management has provided teachers with opportunities to become involved in the total school enterprise and participate in decisions that affect its future direction. These and other changes in the educational landscape have contributed to a shift from university-based professional development to school district-based and school-based professional development. Of course, universities continue to provide teachers with professional development experiences. In fact, large numbers of teachers continue to enroll in university graduate programs across the nation. However, in many schools and school districts it is felt that teachers need more than graduate education, and the reason for this feeling is based on major changes that are occurring in the schools. As Lieberman (1995) notes, "Today's approach to professional development goes far beyond the technical tinkering that has often characterized inservice training. The process of restructuring schools places demands on the whole organization that make it imperative that individuals define their work in relation to the way the entire school works" (p. 592). It is this kind of professional development that some schools and school districts feel they can provide more effectively than if they were to contract services from universities.

Professional development has thus evolved from an often dreaded "inservice" activity that was perceived as something to suffer through to a comprehensive set of career-long experiences that are tailored to assist educators in being successful in their individual and collective evolving professional roles. Taking a rather generic view, Finch (1990) noted that professional development was in the process of evolving into a more comprehensive set of phases that include needs, focus, delivery, and impact. Needs are "derived from the contexts within which professional development will take place and the types of potential professional development recipients" (p. 6). Focus is driven by needs and context as well as content to be delivered and potential benefit to recipients. How professional development is delivered thus becomes a function of needs, focus, context, potential delivery modes, and potential delivery settings. And finally, assessing professional development's impact is a function of context, needs, focus, and delivery.

More recently, Finch et al. (1992) presented a vision of an evolving professional development paradigm. Within this paradigm, consideration is given to teachers' new professional roles in the schools as well as how professional development needs that are generated by these new roles should be met. Professional development assumes a new character that includes greater emphasis on the following:

Support for this paradigm, upon which this document is based, may be found in several sources, including Lieberman's (1995) essay on transforming conceptions of teacher development; Darling-Hammond and McLaughlin's (1995) discussion of policies that contribute to professional development in the context of comprehensive educational reform; Schmidt, Finch, & Faulkner's (1992) study of teachers' roles in the integration of vocational and academic education; Little's (1993) comprehensive essay on professional development in a climate of educational reform; Sparks' (1994) discussion that documents reasons for a paradigm shift in staff development; and Bull & Buechler's (1995, March) in-depth study of professional development in Indiana. As this publication was developed, we also gave consideration to teachers' needs and the contexts within which these needs were generated, the focus of professional development, the various ways that professional development was delivered, and its impact.

Focus

In this publication, ways that the professional development needs of vocational and academic teachers who intend to or are now engaged in school-to-work transition activities are described. The guide does not provide a prescribed set of tasks to be followed or specific steps to be taken. Instead, it provides details of various professional development activities and their impact from the perspectives of school personnel and workforce representatives. During our visits to exemplary school-to-work community sites in eleven different states, we rapidly recognized that teachers' professional development needs in the school-to-work transition environment are much more complex than what they would be in traditional educational settings. We also observed that each of the sites visited had its own context, philosophy, agenda, and policies. This meant teachers' professional development needs in different communities might vary as a function of the particular community setting. Professional development activities focusing on school-to-work transition are often unique to a given community.

Our discussions with almost 200 people at these sites included teachers of vocational and academic subjects; educational administrators and counselors; and business, industry, and community representatives. People we interviewed at these school-to-work sites supported the notion that for professional development to have a positive impact on teachers as well as their students, the professional development process must be both comprehensive and long term. This process requires a major investment of resources to prepare teachers for their involvement in school-to-work transition.

A second focus of this guide is on the many professional development practices that can be used to assist teachers of both vocational and academic subjects in their professional development. Most of these practices are provided in the words of teachers who participated in them or others who were aware of teachers who were engaged in different professional development practices. To make the process of reviewing and selecting professional development practices easier, they are organized into 13 different themes. These themes were based upon analyses of text transcribed from our interviews with people at the participating sites. Details about the study and how the themes were created are included in a companion document titled Facilitating School-to-Work Transition: Teacher Involvement and Contributions (Schmidt, Finch, & Moore, forthcoming). A study summary is included as Appendix A.

Organization

The guide is organized into two main sections. In the first section, each of the 13 professional development themes is presented. Individually, the themes are described through statements made by educators; educational administrators and counselors; and business, industry, and community representatives. Their comments serve to support the multidimensional profile of each theme. Collectively, themes reflect the broad, comprehensive nature of professional development for school-to-work transition. When taken as a whole, the themes present a convincing case for creating comprehensive professional development programs in the long term rather than on a piecemeal basis.

In the second section, ways that school-to-work related professional development may be provided to teachers are discussed. Implications are organized so that consideration is given to teachers as learners. First, teachers can learn by informal means, formal means, or a combination of the two. Second, teacher learning can occur in different contexts, the most common of which are the school, the workplace, the community, and a combination of these. And finally, teachers may be encouraged to develop professionally through the use of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Merging the consideration of teachers as learners with a professional development framework resulted in the creation of a useful organizing scheme to employ when considering which teacher professional development approaches to use and when to use them. Several suggestions for using professional development to help teachers prepare for school-to-work responsibilities are then offered. The suggestions are organized around each of the four stages included in the professional development framework: professional development needs, focus, delivery, and impact.


<< >> Title Contents NCRVE Home
NCRVE Home | Site Search | Product Search