| Name: | _____________________________________ | Teacher ID Number: | __________________________________ |
| Not
at all helpful |
|
|
|
Very
helpful | ||
| A. |
Reading the "Classrooms that Work" report (Summary and Chapter 3) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| B. |
Presentation and briefing slides (e.g., Mr. Price's English vs. landscape classes) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| C. |
Zulu Love Letter Pin and discussion
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| D. |
Case studies and discussion ("Jigsaw" format)
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| E. |
"Cognitive Apprenticeship" reading (AFT article) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| F. |
"Five Traits of Good Teaching" article, discussion
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| G. |
Journal entry ("Write a letter to your colleague")
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| H. |
Coaching from and discussions with your peers |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| I. |
Coaching from and discussions with project staff |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| Not
at all helpful |
Very helpful |
|||||
| A. |
Presentation on observation methods
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| B. |
Practice observation at RAND and discussion
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| C. |
(MTA only) Group meeting with mentors |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
How helpful were the following activities in helping you complete and summarize the observations of Week 2?
| Not
at all helpful |
|
|
|
Very helpful |
||
| D. |
Phone conversation with staff on first day |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| E. |
Coaching/assistance from staff
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| F. |
Midweek day of debriefing and writing at RAND |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| G. |
Writing fieldnotes
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| H. |
Writing the "authentic practice summary"
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| I. |
Journal entries related to fieldwork
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| Not
at all helpful |
|
|
|
Very helpful |
||
| A. |
Presentation on approaches to designing curriculum (Module 2 materials on thematic vs. integrated curriculum) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| B. |
Presentation on assessment
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| C. |
Coaching/discussions with peers
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| D. |
Coaching/discussions with project staff
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| E. |
First presentation of curriculum design (at RAND) and peer review |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| F. |
Second presentation of curriculum design
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| G. |
Resources at RAND: computer, Internet
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| H. |
Resources at RAND: materials (e.g., xeroxing, supplies) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| I. |
Journal entries related to design work
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Not
at all |
Very |
|||||
| A. |
Videotaping and discussion
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| B. |
Coaching/discussions with peers
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| C. |
Coaching/discussions with project staff
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| D. |
Preparing for final presentation
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| E. |
Journal entries related to teaching and |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| F. |
Presentation and discussion related |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
| 5A. | What are the most important ways in which your professional practice changed in the course of the mini-sabbatical? |
| 5B. | For each of the changes identified above, what do you think were the critical moments or experiences during the mini-sabbatical that contributed to this change? |
| 5C. | In retrospect, what might have helped you accomplish the changes you achieved more easily or what might have enabled you to make additional changes that you hoped for? |
| 5D. | What is the likelihood that you will incorporate these changes (if you made any) into your day-to-day professional practice? |
| 5E. | Generally, is there anything else the project staff (and, indirectly, the project's funders) should know about designing and implementing a professional development activity such as the mini-sabbatical? |