The Future Is Now:
Learning, Design, and the 21st Century
Work in Progress at the University of Minnesota
What would a school look like which was designed to be
learner-focused, technologically constantly updated, and which was
intended, by its very use of space, light, and other architectural
elements, to celebrate a sense of the learning community? Researchers
at NCRVE's University of Minnesota site are looking at these questions
in a new study of two-year institutions of higher education.
Their work builds on two earlier NCRVE activities, "New Designs for
the Comprehensive High School" and "New Designs for the Comprehensive
High School: Continuing the Visioning".
The study considers two-year institutions of higher education
including community colleges, vocational and technical colleges and
institutes, and two-year professional schools.
How Should "A 21st Century Two-Year Higher Education Institution"
Look?
Researchers are taking a holistic approach, focusing on the technical,
occupational, and professional components of two-year institutions.
Ideas from around the United States, as well as from other countries
are being examined. For example, Tea Tree Gully College of Technical
and Further Education, in Modbury, South Australia features advanced
technology to manage and deliver learning nationally and
internationally, flexible and competency-based learning, open entry
and open exit access by students, recognition of prior learning,
partnerships with the community to enhance learning resources and
contribute to community social and economic development, and
decentralized decision-making and authority. The design of the campus
is intended to reflect and enhance the learning processes,
organizational structures, and learner outcomes.
Focusing on the whole institution forces the syntheses of findings and
recommendations from other projects that studied separate components
or strategies for improvement. The "new design" will provide a vision
to guide longer range planning and policy so that separate elements
come together and advantage can be taken of opportunities to put whole
designs into place. Suggested design criteria are listed at the end
of this article.
The development process for this project follows the pattern used in
the very successful NCRVE project, "New Designs for the Comprehensive
High School." The "new designs" are developed through a series of
phases, each addressing an important desired element:
- learner outcomes
- learning processes (i.e., curriculum, instruction, assessment)
- organizational structures and partnerships
- staffing and staff development
- acilities, equipment, and supplies
- cost and sources of funding that are consistent with emerging
- trends in higher education finance
Each phase involves group process (design group, focus groups),
scanning the nation and world for best practices, and research
analysis and synthesis. Focus groups, with membership drawn from
appropriate stakeholder groups, are being used to raise and clarify
issues and potential solutions during each phase of the project. A
design group, whose representatives come from all parts of the
country, is used to guide the project to consensus at each phase of
the project.
The best and most recent thinking, research, and practice relating to
two-year institutions of higher education is being incorporated.
Thus, new designs can be used to describe and demonstrate the future
directions of two-year institutions in an integrated and concrete
format for use in developing visions and for directing further
research and development, training, and dissemination. At the
project's completion the Center will publish a final report describing
the educational specifications and supporting rationale for new
designs for two-year institutions of higher education.
For more information, please contact the following individuals at
NCRVE, University of Minnesota
1954 Buford Avenue, R-460
St. Paul, MN 55108
George Copa, (612) 624-9284, FAX (612) 624-4720 or
William Ammentorp, (612) 624-1352, FAX (612) 624-3377
Design Criteria
- Imaginative
- Breaking boundaries
- Different directions for different institutions (situational, designed to be different)
- Entrepreneurship (searching, exploring, risking, investing, incorporating)
- Growth by substitution (shifting emphasis, new for old)
- Directional
- Mission development (as relates to learners and community-social and economic agenda, part of social fabric)
- Gives focus and coherence
- Active role in stewardship of community
- Two-years of post-secondary education as basic (the "fault line" in education)
- Responsive
- Diversity of learners (culture, age, gender)
- Access (cost, distance, time, learning readiness)
- Lifelong learning
- Technological change (as subject matter, learning delivery, change agent)
- Market competition
- Change agent, proactive, setting the pace
- Flexibility (continuous quality improvement approach, a learning community)
- Pace of response
- Customer service
- Collaborative
- Curriculum integration (academic/general and
vocational/occupational/professional)
- Institutional articulation
(secondary/postsecondary, two-year/four-year)
- Partnerships (with family, employers, community agencies, other
schools/colleges/universities)
- Broker of services (linking of needs and services provided by others,
take shared responsibility)
- Seamless learning supported
- Accountable
- Learning outcomes
- Quality assurance to stakeholders
- Continous improvement
- Productivity
- Resourced
- Increasing revenues (short and long term, immediacy vs primacy)
- Containing cost
- Increasing efficiency
- Recognizing what is done as matter of choice, higher education is discretionary
- Establishing equity and fairness in who pays
Table of Contents | Next Article | Previous Article